Les règles, sans filtre.

Un aperçu récurrent de ce qui ressort des mises en œuvre. Chaque entrée renvoie à l'article sur Substack.

• Systems Question
  RU-0162026.10

  The binder on the shelf.

  Ask a ministry for its competency framework and the usual answer is a search that turns up nothing, or a job description thirty years old. Where a framework does exist, a donor project usually paid for it, a workshop validated it, and it went into a binder in the HR office, because nobody in that chain is paid for it being used the next year. A framework gets used when it describes work a supervisor can observe, rates a handful of skills properly rather than forty by guesswork, plugs into the review and the training plan that already happen, and can be changed by someone in the office.

  competencies · appraisal · BenchLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0152026.10

  Did the training move anyone?

  The summary table for a training component counts courses, days and participants, and cannot say whether anyone can now do something they could not do before. The count is reported because it cannot fail; an end-of-course test measures what people remember on the last afternoon. Answering the real question takes three things: written levels for what each position needs, a baseline rating by the supervisor from actual work, and the same rating six months to a year later. Measure against the position as well as the person, because a trained officer who is transferred takes the capability with them.

  training · capability · BenchLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0142026.09

  The gap analysis you already paid for.

  Almost every accrual transition starts with a gap analysis, organised standard by standard, which sizes the task and gets the programme funded, and then usually nothing follows. A list of absences has no order and no names, and nobody's job description has an accounting standard in it. The more useful gap analysis arrives at the end of the first year and is called the audit report: tested against the records, filtered to what is material, and due again next year. Rebuild the remaining plan around the findings, organise it by who does the work, and take first whatever unblocks everything else.

  accrual · gap analysis · auditLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0132026.09

  The auditors were trained last.

  An audit office is often examining a government's first accrual statements while it is still learning how, and the report is read as though that were not so. The cause is structural: the transition is a finance ministry programme, with that ministry's budget line and steering committee, and the audit office is a separate institution nobody sits at the centre of. Where it stalls is the budget, because audit training is not a line in the programme. The first opinion after a transition measures two things at once, whether the accounts were ready and whether the people examining them were.

  audit · accrual · capacityLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0122026.09

  What the whole of government actually owes.

  The consolidated statement is the last one prepared and the first one read, because it answers what the state has and what it owes. Adding the entities up is the easy part; the subtractions are where it becomes difficult, since a transaction between two entities was recorded twice, by different people, in different months and sometimes at different amounts. The first attempt is less an accounting exercise than a discovery exercise: undisclosed SOE guarantees, unpaid power bills nobody was tracking. Start with the list of entities and a written reason for each being in or out, then publish it.

  consolidation · controlled entitiesLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0112026.09

  Who writes the management response.

  Every audit report contains two documents, and the one people work on for the next year is the second. The management response is printed alongside the findings, so an oversight committee, a donor or a new minister reads the finding and the answer together. Answer each finding with a step, a date and a named post and the report reads as a second-year work programme; answer "noted" and it reads as a filing exercise. Disagreeing is allowed, provided the refutation is disciplined. Who writes it is decided months before the report arrives, by whether anyone asked.

  audit report · accrualLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0102026.09

  The first opinion is going to be qualified.

  The first audit opinion after an accrual transition is almost always qualified, for reasons that were visible three years earlier. The opening balance has never been audited by anybody, because until that year it did not exist in that form, fixed assets are short and the employee benefit liability has never been valued. Saying so at the start of the transition costs nothing and turns the audit report from a blow into a document everyone expected, and a qualified opinion is a working list of specific matters, which is a different thing from a disclaimer.

  accrual · audit opinionLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0092026.08

  What the register says is there.

  An asset register is wrong in both directions at once: things on the list that left the building years ago, and things in the building that were never written down. Purchases reach the list on their own, because buying creates paperwork somebody is required to file. Disposals need a committee, an inspection and a signature, and transfers need nothing at all. Nobody is measured on whether the register is right, which is survivable until accrual turns it into one of the largest lines on the statement of financial position.

  fixed assets · accrualLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0082026.08

  What the government thinks it has.

  A treasury can pay every bill on time and still hold only an estimate of what it has in the bank. The ledger balance and the bank's differ for reasons that are dull individually and compound with age, and the only process that settles them runs monthly at best, from the most junior desk in the office. Falling years behind makes no noise at all, and cash rationing means the estimate is what this week's payment decisions actually run on.

  cash · reconciliationLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0072026.08

  Three lists, one payday.

  The largest recurring expenditure in the budget reaches the ledger as the least informative entry of the month: gross, deductions, net. Everything that made those totals happened in offices that never post a journal, the establishment register, the appointment letter, the acting allowance nobody stopped. An appointment is a commitment that runs for years and clears no commitment control.

  payroll · commitmentLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0062026.08

  The contract the ledger never saw.

  A contract signed on a Wednesday: three years, four milestones, five per cent retention, a performance security lodged before any work starts. The finance system hears none of it until the first invoice lands eleven weeks later, one number. The largest obligations are the ones the ledger learns about last.

  procurement · commitmentLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0052026.07

  The check in the wrong place.

  The purchase order clears, because there is money left in the vote. Eight weeks later the invoice arrives and the contract was signed by someone who did not hold the authority to sign it. Budget availability is the part of control a system can always answer. The procedure is the part it usually cannot.

  commitment · procedureLire sur Substack →
• Systems Question
  RU-0042026.07

  One chart, three readers.

  One invoice for a generator, read by three people who never meet: the budget office reading control, the accountant reading IPSAS, the statistician reading GFS. Three true descriptions of one machine, which only become a contradiction when the chart forces them through a single field.

  IPSAS · GFS · budgetLire sur Substack →
• Compliance Check
  RU-0032026.07

  Where your law and the standard disagree, the law wins.

  The standard says capitalise the truck. The financial instructions, written twenty years before anyone had heard of accrual, say it is expenditure of the vote. Both sentences are on the same desk. What the officer who signs can actually defend, and what has to be written down on the day.

  IPSAS · statuteLire sur Substack →
• IPSAS, Unfiltered
  RU-0022026.07

  The paragraph that doesn't exist.

  Ask a general-purpose AI tool a public-sector accounting question and it will often cite a standard and paragraph that do not exist. Why, in this work, the citation is the part the auditor checks, and the discipline of re-reading every reference against its source before it is marked as supported.

  IPSAS · citationsLire sur Substack →
• Manifesto
  RU-0012026.07

  Every rule that binds it.

  One ordinary payment answers to three rulebooks at once: the accounting standard, your own law, and the donor's manual. The first post sets out what Rules, Unfiltered is for, and the checking discipline behind every finding.

  IPSAS · statute · donorLire sur Substack →

Les articles sont publiés sur Substack afin que les praticiens puissent s'abonner et les lire dans leur propre fil. Cette page archive l'index pour que les tendances restent accessibles.